Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicOwl
The problem with that perspective is that the erosion on the sphinx can be explained by natural process that are concordant with our understanding of Egyptian history. If the sphinx is over 9-12,000 years, why do all the Egyptian artifacts conform to the common scientific understanding of history? Most of the proponents for an alternative history of humanity aren't really looking for the truth. Rather than following scientific procedure, they come with a fully formed opinion of what happened. Then they look for any evidence that could possibly be seen as confirming their opinion. They ignore any information that contradicts their opinion and they never perform any tests or experiments. That's why their views are seen as pseudo-science by the scientific community.
|
Reminds me of a debate I watched recently.
Threaded Mode