That is where the debate started. Basically a couple of people began selling and showing serious interest in this line. The debate came up on 2 main points. One are all Jungles true Jungles that are listed and advertised and number 2, characteristics that prove a Jungle to be a true Jungle. Of course true paperwork from the Swedish lines would be the best proof, no one could contest that after. But then getting them from second sources like Celia, and Peter and others should also be just as good because they would carry the same paperwork from the original source. If you paid the high dollar on this boa and got it from a top breeder who has to give you the copies of there proof it is a Jungle line then your set to venture forward to claim you have a Jungle as well. To go about it without that paperwork and claim a Jungle or having a Jungle litter in years to come from this boa will not always be contested unless someone brings it up later in a post about your line.
I remember in that debate one fellow claiming there was no true way to visually determine a Jungle, but he later had to rethink that claim because he was passing off some babies as Jungles when this debate broke out and real information came up to contest his claim and his litter. Few after believed he had Jungles but more just really nice normals. The others that believe in his litter and later breed those babies will be the ones who can say if they were ripped off or not.
Goodluck.
|