|  |
Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
08-29-04, 11:32 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Jul-2004
Location: Mitchell, Ontario
Age: 37
Posts: 814
|
Mojave question
I've read some contradicting info on mojaves. Some sources say that the trait is dominant and other sources call it co-dom, but (to my knowledge) there has never been a super mojave produced. How can they be sure that it is co-dom by seeing only the het form?
Thank You
Cam Hanna
|
|
|
08-29-04, 11:39 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Join Date: Jun-2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Age: 43
Posts: 345
|
I'm just taking a wild stab at this, but perhaps some people call it codominant because the offspring of a mojave and a normal are half mojave and half normal, and other people call it dominant because there is no super form. I think the prior is correct, as the dictionary definition of codominant does not imply anything about a super form.
__________________
1.0 Pastel Ball Python, 1.9 Normal Ball Pythons, 0.1 African House Snake, 1.0 Savannah Monitor, 0.0.1 Argentinian Horned Frog
|
|
|
08-29-04, 11:41 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Sep-2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 478
|
I think people believe a Leucistic is the Super but I don't think a Leucistic has been produced from a Mojave x Mojave yet.
|
|
|
08-30-04, 12:05 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Join Date: Jun-2002
Location: GTA
Age: 48
Posts: 36
|
No one has been successful in producing a clutch of Mojave to Mojave. I don't think the Snake Keeper has gotten one clutch yet, but I'm sure they will have it proven out by next season. Yes many Dominate traits are called Co-Dominate before they are even proven. I also agree with Ron that alot of believe the Leucistic is the Super Form.
|
|
|
08-30-04, 01:01 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Join Date: Jun-2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Age: 43
Posts: 345
|
"In genetics, the term dominant gene refers to the an allele that causes a phenotype that is seen in a heterozygous genotype. Strictly, it is the phenotype (or trait) which is dominant, not the gene."
"Codminant Gene - A set of two or more alleles, each expressed phenotypically in the presence of the other."
In other words, ignore what I said earlier :P
__________________
1.0 Pastel Ball Python, 1.9 Normal Ball Pythons, 0.1 African House Snake, 1.0 Savannah Monitor, 0.0.1 Argentinian Horned Frog
|
|
|
08-30-04, 01:55 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: Guelph
Age: 45
Posts: 972
Country:
|
Last year 3 clutches of Mojave x Mojave were produced and only Mojaves and normals were produced.
Corey
|
|
|
08-30-04, 01:59 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Join Date: Aug-2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 672
|
There were three clutches of Mojave to Mojave breeding in 2003 (between Morph King and Snake Keeper I believe) totalling around 18 eggs. Nothing more than Mojave's were produced......either the trait is Dominant or they're really missing the odds  I hear there are more clutches due to hatch any time now as well, so we will see. Personally, I'll agree with the others in that it is a dominant mutation and that the Leucistic is linked to the Lesser Platinum gene........
JonK
__________________
www.NiagaraReptiles.com
|
|
|
08-30-04, 04:07 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jul-2004
Location: Mitchell, Ontario
Age: 37
Posts: 814
|
I see...
Thank You.
|
|
|
08-31-04, 05:57 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2003
Location: Colorado
Age: 58
Posts: 126
|
I hadn't heard about the mojave X mojave clutches. Not that big of a surprise as there are lots of secrets and I'm not particularly in the know. I had expected that cross well before now but at some point (last year?, maybe early in the season) I saw a post where SK said the cross hadn't been made yet.
Just to double-check, are you sure the breedings you are thinking of where mojave x mojave? The reason I ask is because I seem to remember about that number of eggs from mojave X pastel without pastave before this year so was wondering if the two where confused. I was sure based on those odds that the mojave and pastel where somehow incompatible but then they start popping up this year so I guess it is possible to mis even on that many eggs.
__________________
Randy Remington
|
|
|
08-31-04, 07:56 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Join Date: Apr-2003
Posts: 995
Country:
|
I saw the mojave pastels, they looked amazing, but by no means a super. They were mojaves with bright yellow as the circles!
I like the classic ones myself, of most morphs..... but the supers need to be tried too!
Jessy
|
|
|
09-06-04, 04:52 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2003
Location: Colorado
Age: 58
Posts: 126
|
NiagaraReptiles,
I checked with SnakeKeeper and MorphKing and neither have yet produced any eggs from Mojave X Mojave. I think you and I bet also Corey where thinking of Mojave X Pastel. As of 9/4 Colette reports not knowing of anyone producing Mojave X Mojave eggs. Hopefully there will be some Mojave X Mojave clutches next year to answer if the super Mojave is leucistic or not.
__________________
Randy Remington
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
 |