| |
Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
12-31-04, 01:50 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Join Date: Jun-2003
Location: near Windsor, Ontario
Age: 63
Posts: 996
|
Quote:
Originally posted by legolas
my boa was found dumped on a building site around 6 years ago. she had been left for dead.
with lots of TLC she is now 9 feet long, abit overweight and beautiful.
|
If that boa was left for dead like that then I think that a greater cruelty than feeding live is clearly shown.
__________________
Why are there braille dots on
the keypads at drive up ATMs?
|
|
|
12-31-04, 02:02 PM
|
#17
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: M.O.L, Oceania
Age: 41
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
If that boa was left for dead like that then I think that a greater cruelty than feeding live is clearly shown.
|
So what does this mean? That you would ban the keeping of reptiles based on human neglect? Or are you saying two wrongs make a right?
I'm getting confused by some of the arguments people are putting forth. The thread starter simply said live feeding, with the exception of bugs, is illegal because it is seen as inhumane. Yes, so is leaving a snake to die. Are you perhaps saying because people are cruel in general that all cruelties should be allowed?
If you think it isn't inhumane, say so and say why.
So far...I've seen a couple people sort of attack the law and seem quite disgruntled...but the arguments are confusing.
__________________
I am highly prized for my meat. :eb:
|
|
|
12-31-04, 02:10 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 20
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
Originally posted by JimmyDavid
I noticed that you said it's illegal because it's cruel. That means they are not concerned that a rodent might bite a snake. So they discriminate wich animal is more important... It's Stupid.
The snake has no right to kill for food, the rodent has the right to be protected from becoming food.
I have a question : what if you use a snake to feed ANOTHER snake? does the rule aplly? Because in that case they would be protecting the same animal that they didn't give a **** about before.
|
If you are so interested why don't you take a look at UK records and find out the reason for it? People can give the reasons they think the law was put into place but without evidence it is only assumption. Obviously the law was thought out for some time because it is only recently that practices like fox hunting was banned and that has to be worse than live feeding.
People have already demonstrated that most snakes in captivity don't need live food so I don't think the government is putting snakes before mice or disregarding the welfare of snakes in general.
|
|
|
12-31-04, 03:55 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2004
Location: london
Age: 59
Posts: 22
|
i wasnt looking for arguements when i asked the original question on live feeding. i do happen to agree with much of what has been said.
i dont happen to agree with fox hunting either. its barbaric.
in my opinion, the cruelest species on this planet are us humans.
i asked the original question because a family member who lives in the US thinks that to kill the rodent first is inhumane.
she believes that to watch "the kill" is fun. i tried to explain that its not a case of being fun, you should do what is best for the herp.
her justification for her actions are that she supplies the rodent with food, water and a place to hide.
notice, no mention of her herp at all.
__________________
The Flying Boa :W
|
|
|
12-31-04, 04:05 PM
|
#20
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2004
Location: Fredericton, N.B.
Posts: 808
|
I think making live feeding illegal is a good idea, I realize as much as anyone that it is sometimes necessary and that there is no way to really regulate it. but just the fact it is illegal would eliminate allot of people doing it. all those people who think it's "cool" would think twice before making it a regular practice. it would still happen but it would encourage the use of prekilled prey.
Devon
|
|
|
01-01-05, 02:10 AM
|
#21
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2004
Age: 64
Posts: 154
Country:
|
Oh man ANIMAL RIGHTS Activist owning pets !!! Fox Hunting is BARBARIC. Well I'll take on the Live verses killed issue first, I think I am safe in saying that most people who prefer feeding deceased animals to their Herps do so more to protect their animals from possible harm then for any feelings for the prey animal. Myself if it's a youngster it starts on live, if it will adjust to fresh killed or F/T when older great if not I'm not going to starve one of our snakes to force it to eat pre killed. Yes I'm sure that it can't be any fun being grabbed , hugged way to tightly, and dieing but that's what nature designed them to do and made more rats and mice etc. then we or the snakes can ever put much of a dent into . I'll say this if it's ever outlawed over here I'll get rid of my animals and find somewhere else to live because the nuts have taken over.
As for Fox hunting why is it barbaric? For the most part they get chased around by dogs and every once in a while one gets caught. Seeing as there are no wolves etc to do the same naturally ie kill off the slow and less fit, why shouldn't numans and their hounds take up the slack and keep the fox in England from regressing? It's not like you don't have more than enough Fox over there heck they live in the cities.
By the way this did happen a few years back and yes I'm aware that fox hunting has been outlawed in merry old England.
What is barbaric is a bunch of Animal rights Activist forceing a pack of hounds who were chaseing a fox, off of a crossing over electric train tracks. The dogs fried to death to the cheers of the Animal rights ers. Now in my book and any reasonable human beings book that is sick cruel and barbaric! The fox who most likely would not have been caught went on its merry way.
And I know some one will bring it up- No the dogs are not forced to hunt they hunt because they love it. If you've ever owned a hunting dog that does hunt then you know that sometimes you wonder what they love more you or the game they hunt. Randy
Last edited by ravensgait; 01-01-05 at 02:14 AM..
|
|
|
01-01-05, 06:21 AM
|
#22
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2004
Location: london
Age: 59
Posts: 22
|
im not an animal activist. i just believe that there is a more humane way to kill some animals.
ie; shoot a fox if you must, if its causing a real problem.
at the end of the day, none of us would like to be chased by a pack of anything, whether it be animal or human.
__________________
The Flying Boa :W
|
|
|
01-01-05, 03:38 PM
|
#23
|
Member
Join Date: Jun-2003
Location: near Windsor, Ontario
Age: 63
Posts: 996
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Youkai
So what does this mean? That you would ban the keeping of reptiles based on human neglect? Or are you saying two wrongs make a right?
I'm getting confused by some of the arguments people are putting forth. The thread starter simply said live feeding, with the exception of bugs, is illegal because it is seen as inhumane. Yes, so is leaving a snake to die. Are you perhaps saying because people are cruel in general that all cruelties should be allowed?
If you think it isn't inhumane, say so and say why.
So far...I've seen a couple people sort of attack the law and seem quite disgruntled...but the arguments are confusing.
|
First off I must say huh??
I commented on the cruelty of leaving an animal to die is much mor cruel than feeding live. What you take exception to I don't understand unless discarding an animal that you don't want is your idea of a kindness. That in my mind is more cruel than feeding live. If our opinions differ on that then I am afraid that we have to agree to disagree on that. I din't advocate any ban at all so I must be equally confused here.
I have stated in many threads that I don't believe in feeding live myself but in the cases where it is neccessary, then do it but try to get the animal in question weaned off live if possible.
__________________
Why are there braille dots on
the keypads at drive up ATMs?
Last edited by RepTylE; 01-01-05 at 03:42 PM..
|
|
|
01-01-05, 04:42 PM
|
#24
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 1,818
Country:
|
you have to do whats best for the animal... wether it be f/t or live it doesnt matter... personally i wouldnt breed snakes or get one that didnt eat f/t but that is because i love animals and couldnt do that to a mouse( id end up keeping more than feeding) lol... as for hunting, i have no prob with it, and as for the law against live prey, i have nothing against that either... there is nothing rong with that law, and theres nothing rong with feeding live...
i do have one ? thogh... someone said thay cant sell rodents if its thought that it will be used for food... but what happens if you do need to feed live... then what... do you get a special permet.
__________________
enough animals. finally lowerd my herp collect to 40
|
|
|
01-01-05, 05:33 PM
|
#25
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 20
Posts: 339
|
I'll mention it again, the law allows live feeding for animals that will die without it.
There really shouldn't be much of an issue to this. Most CB animals don't need live feeding and it has already been established that non-live feeding is safer. So even if a law was implemented internationally, no one would be losing their pets because of it. No one would be sending their snakes to the snakey shelter or setting them lose. The reptile trade is still going strong in the UK and their snakes are not suffering because of it.
BTW, let's not turn this into an issue of animal rights activists, PETA or whatever because it isn't.
edit: I should mention that my statement "There really shouldn't be much of an issue to this," means the keeper of the snake should make their own (legal) choice here in North America. I wasn't implying there should be a law and that there is no reason otherwise
Last edited by spidergecko; 01-01-05 at 05:43 PM..
|
|
|
01-01-05, 06:56 PM
|
#26
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2004
Location: london
Age: 59
Posts: 22
|
i totally agree with you. leaving an animal to die in a building site is beyond cruel. thats why when she was found, she wasnt left there. i do not understand how someone can do that to another living creature.
if i didnt look after her, she would have died a long time ago.
as it is, my baby is healthy, beautiful and very much loved.
when she was found, i knew nothing about looking after boas, now i know she is in safe hands.
it seems that the only possible reason she was dumped in the first place is, the last 2 inches of her tail are deformed.
in my eyes, no reason to treat her in such an inhumane way.
__________________
The Flying Boa :W
|
|
|
01-01-05, 08:54 PM
|
#27
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 1,818
Country:
|
no one answered my question... if you must feed live for the sake of the animal then do you need a permet or do you just have to fly under the radar
__________________
enough animals. finally lowerd my herp collect to 40
|
|
|
01-01-05, 10:14 PM
|
#28
|
Member
Join Date: Feb-2004
Location: Edmonton
Age: 46
Posts: 842
|
Quote:
Originally posted by spidergecko
I'll mention it again, the law allows live feeding for animals that will die without it.
|
Spider gecko answered you quite a while back.
I dont' think that it is inhumane to feed live, I think a snake kills the mouse or rat fast, I prefer feeding FT cause it is way easier to keep a stash of FT rats in my freezer than a bunch of live rodents. As for inhumane. Check out where your burgers and bacon come from and the manner in which they are killed. We are much more humane with the way we kill our rats for our snakes than we are with how our own food is put down. Funny how that works. They should be looking at stricter laws there not stopping snakes from killing mice dumb politicians, but hey money talks in governments!
__________________
Nita Hamilton
BALL PYTHONS!!
|
|
|
01-01-05, 10:30 PM
|
#29
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: Manitoba
Age: 34
Posts: 1,378
Country:
|
How is live feeding cruel to the rodent?
Are they going to make it illegal for snakes to kill live prey in the wild?
|
|
|
01-01-05, 11:34 PM
|
#30
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 1,818
Country:
|
i realise that... thats not my question though...
Quote:
Originally posted by legolas
petstores arent allowed to sell you rodents and the like, if it suspected that it will be used as food.
|
so if there not aloud to sell them to you if its for food how do you get them... wouldnt you just be able to walk in and say "he needs it or hell die" without ever even tryin f/t....
so if you really wanted to you could totally excuse that law... thats why i asked if a permet is needed or do you have to get them from somewhere special..
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
|