border
sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum
 

Go Back   sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum > Community Forums > General Discussion

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-15, 10:45 AM   #1
FWK
Member
 
FWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2014
Location: Victoria, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 774
Country:
Re: Please tell me its a good one.

I used to be the same way, and I still agree with you to a certain extent. But once I finally got the source of the changes and read the papers themselves (as tedious as that can be) I understood the reasons for all the changes and why the old subspecies didn't really make a lot of sense. The was virtually no morphological difference between the old subspecies, they were basically divided up by colors and pattern. It would be sort of like dividing up Ball Python morphs up into a bunch of different subspecies. The different colors and patterns found in Black Rat Snakes are just natural morphs that happen to be dominate in certain parts of their range. The three species that are recognized now are separated by natural barriers and have been evolving separately long enough to be considered genetically distinct, though not morphologically distinct.
FWK is offline  
Login to remove ads
Old 09-11-15, 11:21 AM   #2
eminart
Member
 
eminart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2014
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,042
Country:
Re: Please tell me its a good one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FWK View Post
I used to be the same way, and I still agree with you to a certain extent. But once I finally got the source of the changes and read the papers themselves (as tedious as that can be) I understood the reasons for all the changes and why the old subspecies didn't really make a lot of sense. The was virtually no morphological difference between the old subspecies, they were basically divided up by colors and pattern. It would be sort of like dividing up Ball Python morphs up into a bunch of different subspecies. The different colors and patterns found in Black Rat Snakes are just natural morphs that happen to be dominate in certain parts of their range. The three species that are recognized now are separated by natural barriers and have been evolving separately long enough to be considered genetically distinct, though not morphologically distinct.

Do you have a link, or any info on how they're split up? I'm STILL confused on the rat snakes. It's difficult when searching to know which is the new info and which is the old.
__________________
“...the old ones ... knew in their bones... that death exists, that all life kills to eat, that all lives end, that energy goes on. They knew that humans are participants, not spectators.” -- Stephen Bodio, On the Edge of the Wild
eminart is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:39 PM   #3
FWK
Member
 
FWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2014
Location: Victoria, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 774
Country:
Re: Please tell me its a good one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eminart View Post
Do you have a link, or any info on how they're split up? I'm STILL confused on the rat snakes. It's difficult when searching to know which is the new info and which is the old.
Sure, I should have the paper bookmarked on my computer at home. I'll link it when I get home tonight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSSSnakes View Post
We can't just kill things in nature that maybe a threat to us. We need to teach our children to respect and not destroy. Nature was here first, we are the intruders. In my state killing a rattlesnake is a crime. Education is the key. This is not intended to be rude nor am I trying to start an argument, we just need to be environmentally conscience.
^^ All of this, well said.
FWK is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.

right