My ACE prefers cold?

[CrotalusR#1]

Originally Posted by SSSSnakes

When you were identifying a snake from another country you stated that you were 100% correct what the snake was. When asked to prove it you said, I have seen many of them and I am correct. Correct or not you did not prove anything. Saying a snake looks like a picture is not Identifying a snake. They go by scale counts and location where the snake was found.

The thread is in general discussions, titled, Help identifying a snake

That's like showing a picture of a damn ball python and saying well prove it or it's not a ball python.. It was just completely obvious and another member agreed with exactly what I was saying and said the same thing.... That's exactly what it was there's no reason for me to explain it.

This is what another member said.

Originally Posted by raidcrasher

I totally agree. After 30 years and having seen thousands of these, my best guess is a obsoleta. Its just an experience thing.

You just did what you have accused me of doing!

Thanks for unknowingly using your self as an example for what you think I did.


At this point this should just stop, is it worth wasting any more time on this thread? Not really so can we just drop it's and move on?

[SSSSnakes]

Originally Posted by CrotalusR#1

That's like showing a picture of a damn ball python and saying well prove it or it's not a ball python.. It was just completely obvious and another member agreed with exactly what I was saying and said the same thing.... That's exactly what it was there's no reason for me to explain it.

This is what another member said.


You just did what you have accused me of doing!

Thanks for unknowingly using your self as an example for what you think I did.


At this point this should just stop, is it worth wasting any more time on this thread? Not really so can we just drop it's and move on?

You still have not proven that that snake is what you said it was. Just because you say it is and someone else agrees with you does not make it a fact. You had to make sure that people Googled the exact same picture as you, because other pictures may prove you wrong.

[CrotalusR#1]

Originally Posted by SSSSnakes

You still have not proven that that snake is what you said it was. Just because you say it is and someone else agrees with you does not make it a fact. You had to make sure that people Googled the exact same picture as you, because other pictures may prove you wrong.

Like I said it's a matter of Experience, I'm sure there are species that you know very well where it takes a quick glance to see exactly what it is. It's hard to point out every detail that makes it what it is because of the slight variations some ones gunna do a google images search and say well bla bla... But this debate isn't about that thread so we'll just leave it at that.

As far as this thread we are talking about. I will say I should have said maybe a few instead of plenty.. In my mined when I said plenty I was thinking 1 or 2 cases is plenty to show that it can and dose happen. So that is my bad.
Should have used the word few or couple vs plenty.

Plenty as in a couple being plenty. Know what I mean?

[SSSSnakes]

Originally Posted by CrotalusR#1

Like I said it's a matter of Experience, I'm sure there are species that you know very well where it takes a quick glance to see exactly what it is. It's hard to point out every detail that makes it what it is because of the slight variations some ones gunna do a google images search and say well bla bla... But this debate isn't about that thread so we'll just leave it at that.

As far as this thread we are talking about. I will say I should have said maybe a few instead of plenty.. In my mined when I said plenty I was thinking 1 or 2 cases is plenty to show that it can and dose happen. So that is my bad.
Should have used the word few or couple vs plenty.

Plenty as in a couple being plenty. Know what I mean?

Agreed. That was a nice way to settle this debate.