2010 Tiger Jag, yay or nay?

[shaunyboy]

Originally Posted by Xanafein

On topic, That is a stunner of a tiger, But methinks i would have only paid around 450 for him, Unless its a female in which case id say 600 is justified.

imo males are worth more than females mate

you buy a female you get " 1 clutch " per breeding season

you buy a male you get " as many clutches " as you want from him

a single male carrying a particular morph or gene,can breed with mutipule females in a season,where as a female can only give you a single clutch

the reason why males hold more value than females

cheers shaun

[red ink]

Originally Posted by shaunyboy

imo males are worth more than females mate

you buy a female you get " 1 clutch " per breeding season

you buy a male you get " as many clutches " as you want from him

a single male carrying a particular morph or gene,can breed with mutipule females in a season,where as a female can only give you a single clutch

the reason why males hold more value than females

cheers shaun

Yep any co-dom or recessive mutation males will always be worth more...

Wether it's the albino gene you are after or in this case the Jag gene as you said 1 female = 1 clutch, were as 1 male = multiple sired clutches