border
sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum
 

Go Back   sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum > Community Forums > General Discussion

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-05, 07:51 PM   #46
joey
Member
 
joey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct-2004
Location: weird planet called earth
Posts: 944
__________________
Partnership for a idiot free America
joey is offline  
Old 02-17-05, 11:30 PM   #47
latazyo
Member
 
latazyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec-2003
Posts: 832
Country:
elements do not make proteins, molecules that are of the amine group form proteins, multiple elements are required to make molecules

an element can not "morph" into a protein, that doesn't even make sense
latazyo is offline  
Old 02-17-05, 11:48 PM   #48
Shad0w
Member
 
Join Date: Aug-2004
Posts: 959
latazyo, well put...
Shad0w is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 12:06 AM   #49
RobV
Member
 
Join Date: Mar-2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 22
What we really need for this discussion is quantum/theoretical physicists and cosmologists.

If I remember from the various university courses dealing in cosmology over the past few years, the Universe is approximately 14 billion years old (14,000,000,000), And it is estimated to contain ~10 to the exponent 14 stars (ie.100,000,000,000,000). *But PLEASE don't quote me on these numbers*

There is a mathematical equation that ESTIMATES the possibility of

- another hospitable planet existing
- life actually existing on that planet (remember it does not have to be carbon based like us)
- that the life-forms are intelligent
- that those life forms can actually contact us

there's a few other variables, but the point is that the more things you consider, the less likely it is to happen....
for example, yes it is almost definite that other hospitable planets exist, it is also likely (but less likely) that on those planets life exists, it is also likely (even less likely that the life is at a stage in its evolution that it is "intelligent"), yada yada yada....

In the end it makes complete sense that there is other life, But it is extremely unlikely that they exist in any evolved enough form right now to be able to contact us....

Again - go to your local university campus and talk to the Physics Department.....

And about time travel - do not forget Einstein - time is relative - not everyone experiences the same time as everyone else - This has been Proven beyond a doubt - they took two quantum clocks (ie extremely precise) - left one in one stationary location, and flew the other around the world - the times no longer match up, both clocks experienced their own time.

Rob
RobV is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 12:46 AM   #50
SnowSnake
Member
 
SnowSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct-2002
Location: Quebec, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 847
Send a message via MSN to SnowSnake
Quote:
Originally posted by latazyo
elements do not make proteins, molecules that are of the amine group form proteins, multiple elements are required to make molecules

an element can not "morph" into a protein, that doesn't even make sense
Sorry bout that... I didn't know how to translate acid aminé from french to english so I used element :P
Some molecules from the amine group were found on a meteorite that hit earth in the 70's (not sure if it was 60's, 70's or 80's). So a scientist took the same kind of amine molecules, put them in a metal container and in a tube she launched a bullet towards the container at imense speeds. The shock waves created by that impact simulated a meteor hitting the earth. It's that energy that morphed the amine molecules into proteins.
__________________
0.1 High Yellow Leopard Gecko; 1.0 Pink Snow Corn Snake ; 1.2 Super hypo tangerine carrot-tail Leopard Gecko ; 1.1 Butter Motley Corn Snake ; 1.2 Blizzard Leopard Gecko
http://www.freewebs.com/gccaptivebred/
SnowSnake is offline  
Login to remove ads
Old 02-18-05, 03:44 AM   #51
Slannesh
Member
 
Slannesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct-2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Age: 50
Posts: 703
Send a message via MSN to Slannesh
Quote:
Originally posted by latazyo
elements do not make proteins, molecules that are of the amine group form proteins, multiple elements are required to make molecules

an element can not "morph" into a protein, that doesn't even make sense
Umm, sorry but that's flat out wrong. Elements make pretty much everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecule

a molecule is the smallest particle of a pure chemical substance that still retains its chemical composition and properties. A molecule consists of multiple atoms joined by shared pairs of electrons in a covalent bond. It may consist of atoms of the same chemical element, as with oxygen gas (O2), or of different elements, as with water vapor (H2O). Abstractly, a single atom may be considered a molecule, as it is when referred to collectively with molecules of multiple atoms, but in practice the use of the word molecule is usually confined to chemical compounds, of multiple atoms.

Amino acids aren't much more than complex hydrocarbon chains. For a more detailed look check out this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amino_acid
__________________
I'm not afraid of the Dark, I'm afraid of what's IN the Dark. ~Anonymous~
Ball Python, Leopard Geckos, Bearded Dragon, Crested Geckos, Corn snakes a Dumeril's Boa and African Dwarf Frogs so far.
Slannesh is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 08:23 AM   #52
JimmyDavid
Member
 
JimmyDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec-2003
Location: Portugal
Age: 50
Posts: 1,005
Beyond the simple point of elements becoming proteins, the TRUE question comes next: ok, so we have proteins, now what? How does a protein become a living organism? When and how really happens a transformation that turns a protein into something that lives?
But the hard question is: How come we never saw it happen again? In nature, all that can happen once, can obviously happen again if all the ingredients are there. But we never saw "dead carbon" turning "live carbon".
__________________
Love will take you far and hate even further.
JimmyDavid is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 09:39 AM   #53
latazyo
Member
 
latazyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec-2003
Posts: 832
Country:
and what do amino acids form?

proteins

and what are amino acids?
complex hydrocarbon chains
and what are complex hydrocarbon chains?
molecules
and what are molecules?
as you and I both said, composed of 1 or more elements

we said the same thing, but I notice my mistake, however I would say it would not qualify as "flat out wrong" as there is one fundamental inaccuracy that doesn't compromise the information

you are right in saying I was wrong when I said multiple elements, I SHOULD have said multiple ATOMS

we're on the same page, just a early morning typo...I'm glad there are some people that know what they're talking about on here...a good checks and balances system we've got
latazyo is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 10:05 AM   #54
Slannesh
Member
 
Slannesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct-2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Age: 50
Posts: 703
Send a message via MSN to Slannesh
Quote:
Originally posted by latazyo
elements do not make proteins, molecules that are of the amine group form proteins, multiple elements are required to make molecules

an element can not "morph" into a protein, that doesn't even make sense
Protiens are made up of elements, at the most basic level everything is.

Multiple elements are not required to make a molecule. O2 is a molecule.

Proteins are made up of elements so it makes perfect sense given the language barrier that, admittedly, you and I were both unaware of at the time

I'm not trying to be a dink here, but I said you were flat out wrong for a reason.
__________________
I'm not afraid of the Dark, I'm afraid of what's IN the Dark. ~Anonymous~
Ball Python, Leopard Geckos, Bearded Dragon, Crested Geckos, Corn snakes a Dumeril's Boa and African Dwarf Frogs so far.
Slannesh is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 03:04 PM   #55
latazyo
Member
 
latazyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec-2003
Posts: 832
Country:
and O2 is made of multiple Oxygen atoms...that was my correction of myself in the last post

oh well I'm not sweating it, this isn't an organic chemistry message board...and if it was we'd be the hugest geeks ever
latazyo is offline  
Login to remove ads
Old 02-18-05, 03:57 PM   #56
coldblooded
Member
 
coldblooded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 155
You guys would be the geeks....

I thinks I read somewhere that intelligent life elsewhere would be/is silica based... cant remember where I got it from though...


Mike
__________________
"Crickets are nothing but crunchy and squirt."
0.0.1 V. exanthematicus,
coldblooded is offline  
Old 02-19-05, 04:46 AM   #57
RobV
Member
 
Join Date: Mar-2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 22
And just the way that carbon based life forms require Water, silica based life forms would most likely require hydrogen sulfide (which is extremely bad for us....)
RobV is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.

right