? about ghost boas

[Jeff_Favelle]

LOL, you mean you haven't already??

The MAIN problem I have with the whole "dominant ghost" thing, is that its not universal. Why don't they call them dominant sunglows? I just don't like how the same genetics are worded differently. If its a super ghost, call it a super ghost. If its a super sunglow, call it a super sunglow. For the longest time, I thought dominant ghosts were a new line of ghosts that would produce ghosts when bred to a normal. I mean, it stands to reason that if an animal is a "dominant ghost", shouldn't it produce more ghosts, and not salmon het anerys?

K.I.S.S.

[Scales Zoo]

Originally posted by BigDan
I have to put new tape on my glasses tomorrow. How about you guys!!

My mom is going to do it for me so I don't hurt myself, again.

Ryan

[varanus69]

. For the longest time, I thought dominant ghosts were a new line of ghosts that would produce ghosts when bred to a normal. I mean, it stands to reason that if an animal is a "dominant ghost", shouldn't it produce more ghosts, and not salmon het anerys?

thats exactly what i was saying in the beginning jeff ( would produce ghosts when bred to a NORMAL!!!). But any way this thread took a hard left turn way back so but i still got an answer as i see it. My opion: ghost are hypo X aneries, so the HYPO gene is co-dom or dom or what ever someone wants to call it today. ANERY is not so there for IMO ghosts are not.

[Jeff_Favelle]

I agree varanus. Its pretty hard to accept the moniker "dominant ghost", when the same doesn' apply to sunglows, which is the same type of genetics. Some conistency would be nice.