border
sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum
 

Go Back   sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum > Community Forums > General Discussion

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-05, 11:44 AM   #16
JAdkins2451
Member
 
JAdkins2451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: ON,Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 616
Country:
Send a message via MSN to JAdkins2451
Quote:
Originally posted by JimmyDavid

I do know, however, that every citizen (yes, even a guilty person) shouldn't have his affairs exposed to public scandal like that. Such civil rights exist to protect us from getting labeled by society and therefore excluded.
Unfortunitley thats how it happens its a story that will "get ratings"

But that comment is like saying no one has the the right to know about sex offenders being released in you neighbourhood. Those end up to be huge scandals. Look at the Micheal Jackson case. Its a big scandelous case but it all over th T.V.

So even though she should have the rights not to have her situation exposed. It happens and its her own stupidity for allowing that to happen. And I am almost sure she was bragging about it or how else would the newa company find out.

Just my opinion.

Jamie
JAdkins2451 is offline  
Old 04-08-05, 12:27 PM   #17
JimmyDavid
Member
 
JimmyDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec-2003
Location: Portugal
Age: 50
Posts: 1,005
When you represent the law or the press you must realise that you hold too much power: The power to deliver YOUR side of the story to the people and therefore control the masses. The way i see it, the negligent use of that power is a crime as well because you can hurt inocent people.
Take the Michael Jackson case; What if they start talking about that scandal in a way that could sound to include artists in general? What if they start saying he's probably guilty because artists are excentric, so what should one expect? Wouldn't they be giving ALL artists a bad name, then?
__________________
Love will take you far and hate even further.
JimmyDavid is offline  
Old 04-08-05, 08:15 PM   #18
JAdkins2451
Member
 
JAdkins2451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov-2004
Location: ON,Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 616
Country:
Send a message via MSN to JAdkins2451
Quote:
Originally posted by JimmyDavid
.Take the Michael Jackson case; What if they start talking about that scandal in a way that could sound to include artists in general? What if they start saying he's probably guilty because artists are excentric, so what should one expect? Wouldn't they be giving ALL artists a bad name, then?
Yes and no in my opinion, if I shooting happens at a school the blame Mr. Manson and his "type" of music. A shooting happens at a night club they blame rappers. But not all rappers are bad and not all are good either way its a lose-lose situation. I geuss it just depends how people look at stuff and the media always looks at the bad. It makes for a better story,

Jamie
JAdkins2451 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.

right