|
|  |
| Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
07-21-03, 04:56 PM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2003
Location: Langley B.C.
Age: 38
Posts: 756
|
He should pay but I doubt he will....
__________________
"Far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement, but few can argue with it."
|
|
|
|
07-21-03, 05:05 PM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 1,177
|
The Omen,
YOU now have the moral AND legal obligation to get these animals to a vet, no matter the cost
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there was never a law passed to obliged us to take our pets to the vet. As long as humanity considers pets to be objects to the owners, we will have problems with that. I spent 750$ on vet bills for a roughneck who still died in the end. If I had to do it again, I would, only would try to spend the money on a vet who knows his stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
07-21-03, 10:19 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: Ottawa
Age: 38
Posts: 3,285
|
Siretsap - actually, there are plenty of laws enforcing this. While they dont say "you need to take your pet to a vet if its sick", allowing a sickness to progress (if it causes the animal pain) or to neglect it's sickness (again, if it causes suffering) IS against the law.
Zoe
|
|
|
|
|
07-21-03, 11:03 PM
|
#19
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2003
Location: Langley B.C.
Age: 38
Posts: 756
|
Zoe that only matter's if its a mammal reptiles actually have no laws at all or at least here in this side of canada
__________________
"Far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement, but few can argue with it."
|
|
|
|
|
07-22-03, 12:12 AM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: Ottawa
Age: 38
Posts: 3,285
|
Bruce, yeah, but I was refering to "pets" (mammals), as was sirestap 
Zoe
|
|
|
|
|
07-22-03, 06:54 AM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov-2002
Location: Right beside you.
Posts: 342
|
Umm guys.. look at Audios location... he ain't in canada.
And Audio,
Sorry to have sounded gruff on the subject of the vets and neglect as it sounded like you weren't wanting to take them.
Seen that too many times, and yes, although the laws on pets/livestock are set up for the fuzzy, people can still be charged with neglect and cruelty for ANY animal in NC, whether it be a wild animal or a non-indegionous import.
Trust me, I have seen reptiles being held at the local shelter, non-adoptable, pending the outcome of their owners 'neglect/abuse' case in court.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.
Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
 |
Linear Mode
