| |
Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
08-30-12, 10:26 AM
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Bucks county PA
Posts: 1,672
Country:
|
A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
I got to thinking why all the island boas aren't in a separate subspecies from Boa Constrictor Imperator????
Island boas like Hog Island, Caulkers, Crawl cays, and Corn Islands all have different adaptions and obviously should all be put into a different subspecies so why don't all the herpetologists and herptoculturists recognize these clearly different boas as their own species????
Does anybody know why this hasn't been done?
|
|
|
08-30-12, 11:47 AM
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Bucks county PA
Posts: 1,672
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Look at these boas and tell me if they should be imperators, just look at the different colors and patterns as well as the difference in size and head structure to mail land BCi.
Corn Island vv
Hog Island vvv
Crawl cay Boa vvv
Caulker cay Boa vvvv
How can people tell me these are all the same species??
|
|
|
08-30-12, 12:12 PM
|
#3
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Nov-2002
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 16,977
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
They don't go "HEY! That looks kind of different. It's a new species!"
It's not how it works. It's based on scientific material and tests. Usually a lot of classification is based on genetics and how close they are to one another on that level as well as scalations and such. It's not colour and pattern that determine it.
|
|
|
08-30-12, 12:35 PM
|
#4
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Sep-2011
Location: Overhill and underhill.
Posts: 7,365
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_S
They don't go "HEY! That looks kind of different. It's a new species!"
It's not how it works. It's based on scientific material and tests. Usually a lot of classification is based on genetics and how close they are to one another on that level as well as scalations and such. It's not colour and pattern that determine it.
|
werd, just saw an article about American and Cuban crocs hybridizing in the wild. Just because they're genetically similar doesn't necessarily mean they'll be dubbed a new species, but it doesn't mean they wont. "The study found just a 1 percent genetic sequence divergence between Cuban crocodiles and American crocodiles in Cuba yet an 8 percent divergence between American crocodiles in Cuba and other American crocodile populations living in mainland Central America."
Wild Cuban crocodiles hybridize with American crocs
|
|
|
08-30-12, 12:40 PM
|
#5
|
slainte mhath
Join Date: Nov-2009
Location: kelty,fife
Age: 58
Posts: 8,509
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_S
They don't go "HEY! That looks kind of different. It's a new species!"
It's not how it works. It's based on scientific material and tests. Usually a lot of classification is based on genetics and how close they are to one another on that level as well as scalations and such. It's not colour and pattern that determine it.
|
^^^^^
that
and imo the taxonomy for snakes is all over the place,with experts arguing amongst themselves half the time
they have not long said bredl's pythons are no longer carpet pythons,they come from a very remote area and have different DNA,to other carpets
taxonomy confuses the hell out of me though
i'm hoping it will improove soon,what with all the genetic studies possible in this day and age
cheers shaun
__________________
ALWAYS judge a person by the way they treat someone who can be of NO POSSIBLE USE TO THEM !
|
|
|
08-30-12, 01:04 PM
|
#6
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Bucks county PA
Posts: 1,672
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_S
They don't go "HEY! That looks kind of different. It's a new species!"
It's not how it works. It's based on scientific material and tests. Usually a lot of classification is based on genetics and how close they are to one another on that level as well as scalations and such. It's not colour and pattern that determine it.
|
Haha I did not say they should be specifically different species because of color and pattern but adaptions that make them a different species, for example the Hog Island Boa can change it's color to better camoflage itself during different light conditions.
|
|
|
08-30-12, 01:08 PM
|
#7
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Nov-2002
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 16,977
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Quote:
Originally Posted by snake man12
Haha I did not say they should be specifically different species because of color and pattern but adaptions that make them a different species, for example the Hog Island Boa can change it's color to better camoflage itself during different light conditions.
|
You posted pics of these animals after asking why aren't these considered different species from BCI. Clearly, you meant colours and pattern and size.
In other news, it's not easy to get a peer reviewed paper to be accepted. It takes a long time. There's a very good post about dwarf retics from someone who did the work for Retics and how it goes about being changed and the length of time it takes.
Go read.
|
|
|
08-30-12, 01:24 PM
|
#8
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Sep-2011
Location: Overhill and underhill.
Posts: 7,365
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_S
In other news, it's not easy to get a peer reviewed paper to be accepted. It takes a long time. There's a very good post about dwarf retics from someone who did the work for Retics and how it goes about being changed and the length of time it takes.
Go read.
|
http://www.ssnakess.com/forums/giant...erparts-2.html
|
|
|
08-30-12, 02:15 PM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: May-2012
Posts: 238
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
|
|
|
08-30-12, 02:49 PM
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct-2011
Location: Bucks county PA
Posts: 1,672
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
I just started it and it is great already!!
|
|
|
09-04-12, 11:22 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Join Date: Dec-2011
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 150
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
Also keep in mind that there has really been no true speciation in the genus Boa for many, many millenia. BCI, BCC, BCA, BCO, etc., are all sub-species of the same species, constrictor. The true definition of a differing species within the same genus is reproductive isolation, either due to geographic separation (and thus divergence of the gene pool for better adapted traits), or a specific adaptation to a previously untapped resource within the same geographic region (new food source, habitat, etc.). Now, why couldn't they give the insular boas their own sub-species identification? My guess is simply not enough research and/or evidence to classify them as such. Taxonomy can be a tricky science.
RR_20 (Mike)
__________________
0.1 Hog Island boa, 0.1 Bolivian boa, 1.0 Nuevo Leon kingsnake, 1.0 Mountain Garter snake
|
|
|
09-04-12, 08:36 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Join Date: Aug-2012
Location: Des moines
Posts: 1,025
Country:
|
Re: A BCI Taxonomy Quandary
All this stuff is very confusing for me seems like its ever changing and very opininated depending on who you ask someone always has a paper or thoughts on this subject
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
|