border
sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum
 

Go Back   sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum > Lizard Forums > Varanid

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-13, 12:29 AM   #46
jarich
Member
 
jarich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct-2011
Posts: 2,237
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by V87 View Post
I knw one zoo doing blood tests for there monitors in co ordination with the t5 super zoo to see wether it makes a difference or not ...

They are also doing uv field studies out in komodo ...
Very much looking forward to these results, though I don't think they will be any surprise.
__________________
The plural of anecdote is not data
jarich is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 10:12 AM   #47
Pirarucu
Member
 
Pirarucu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr-2012
Posts: 2,054
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by V87 View Post
I knw one zoo doing blood tests for there monitors in co ordination with the t5 super zoo to see wether it makes a difference or not ...

They are also doing uv field studies out in komodo ...
The London Zoo, I assume? I'll be interested to see that, though I would agree with Jarich that I don't think they will be surprising results.
Pirarucu is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 01:08 PM   #48
MizCandice
Member
 
Join Date: Oct-2013
Location: South Chicago Suburb
Posts: 186
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdfmonitor View Post
Not used it yet, very hard to fit a UVB bulb in & still achieve 160f basking surface temp & not over heat the run. I prefer a good hot basking spot covering snout to vent myself, if enclosure was twice as big 10x10 then it would be in regardless of needing it.

Black tape is the compare line, bottom right bottom pic. April 7th till around Nov 1st (2nd pic)

Adorable :P .. Im curious to see the end result and compiled data after the experiments
MizCandice is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 01:53 PM   #49
V87
Member
 
V87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2013
Location: Kent
Posts: 181
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by jarich View Post
Very much looking forward to these results, though I don't think they will be any surprise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pirarucu View Post
The London Zoo, I assume? I'll be interested to see that, though I would agree with Jarich that I don't think they will be surprising results.
It would be that very same zoo you speak of ...

Depending on what side of the fence you sit ...I think my side of the fence will be shocked at how right people have been about uv and it's uses and that it may be fundamental for development and health
V87 is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 02:38 PM   #50
murrindindi
Member
 
murrindindi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan-2013
Posts: 974
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by V87 View Post
I think my side of the fence will be shocked at how right people have been about uv and it's uses and that it may be fundamental for development and health

Ooooooooh, now that`s what I call putting yourself right in the line of fire......
murrindindi is offline  
Login to remove ads
Old 12-18-13, 02:41 PM   #51
V87
Member
 
V87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2013
Location: Kent
Posts: 181
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by murrindindi View Post
Ooooooooh, now that`s what I call putting yourself right in the line of fire......
It could be painful but I'm willing to take my chances ....

Or I will disappear into the a puff of smoke and never show my face again ... For shame for shame lol
V87 is offline  
Old 01-02-14, 11:19 AM   #52
infernalis
Moderator
 
infernalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2008
Location: Central New York State
Age: 60
Posts: 16,536
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Well people, time for another turnaround with the thought train.

I have been doing some research into using Metal Halide lamps in my basking array, and the pros all outweigh the cons.

I brought up the idea within the "scientific community" and the replies were overwhelming in favor of using them because...

a. closely copies natural sunlight, in both UVA & UVB output
b. higher lumens to wattage ratio (brighter light cage)
c. energy efficiency of plasma discharge lighting
d. cost effective if I wire my own ballasts.

One quote that sticks out....

__________________
"Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes
of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?"
infernalis is offline  
Old 01-02-14, 01:02 PM   #53
mdfmonitor
Member
 
Join Date: Jun-2013
Posts: 159
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by infernalis View Post
Well people, time for another turnaround with the thought train.

I have been doing some research into using Metal Halide lamps in my basking array, and the pros all outweigh the cons.

I brought up the idea within the "scientific community" and the replies were overwhelming in favor of using them because...

a. closely copies natural sunlight, in both UVA & UVB output
b. higher lumens to wattage ratio (brighter light cage)
c. energy efficiency of plasma discharge lighting
d. cost effective if I wire my own ballasts.

One quote that sticks out....

Wayne stick it in if you want it!! i've just been looking tonight to see if there's room for something in my set-up.

The big debate has always been can you grow & breed monitors without uv/uv bulbs etc, many long term keepers have & still are.

The study that the zoos are doing needs take into account the different methods that current private keepers & zoos are using, as in hot basking temps (i know B.Fry uses hot basking spots) along with uv & without among the same species of monitors.

I'm not sure what i can put in my set up that's worth using that won't over heat the viv & effect the hot basking spot & won't blow again due to the high humidity.

lets us know what you use if you do use something!!
mdfmonitor is offline  
Old 01-02-14, 08:06 PM   #54
Akuma223
Member
 
Akuma223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr-2012
Location: New York
Age: 28
Posts: 548
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by infernalis View Post
Well people, time for another turnaround with the thought train.

I have been doing some research into using Metal Halide lamps in my basking array, and the pros all outweigh the cons.

I brought up the idea within the "scientific community" and the replies were overwhelming in favor of using them because...

a. closely copies natural sunlight, in both UVA & UVB output
b. higher lumens to wattage ratio (brighter light cage)
c. energy efficiency of plasma discharge lighting
d. cost effective if I wire my own ballasts.

One quote that sticks out....

So then It would be good to start adding some sort of uvb now? So what wattage should these halide lamps be at? If they are so beneficial I would like to get them as soon as possible.
Akuma223 is offline  
Old 01-03-14, 04:07 AM   #55
infernalis
Moderator
 
infernalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2008
Location: Central New York State
Age: 60
Posts: 16,536
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akuma223 View Post
So then It would be good to start adding some sort of uvb now? So what wattage should these halide lamps be at? If they are so beneficial I would like to get them as soon as possible.
If you buy one from a reptile shop, about $200 per light.

Wired up myself from scratch, about $50 per light.

Not just UVB, Halide lamps produce UVA & UVB along with a lot of usable light & heat.
__________________
"Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes
of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?"
infernalis is offline  
Login to remove ads
Old 01-03-14, 04:11 AM   #56
infernalis
Moderator
 
infernalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2008
Location: Central New York State
Age: 60
Posts: 16,536
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by jarich View Post
Very much looking forward to these results, though I don't think they will be any surprise.
Considering what Bryan said, and knowing that he keeps Varanids and has his own lab at his disposal, I can't help but trust his immunity/white cell count observation.

Also, metal halide lamps have 5 times the lumen output for the same wattage.... so adding only 1 bulb would be like adding 5 more lights, replacing 2 lamps would give as much light as having 10 basking lamps!!
__________________
"Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes
of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?"

Last edited by infernalis; 01-03-14 at 04:27 AM..
infernalis is offline  
Old 01-03-14, 04:39 AM   #57
formica
Member
 
formica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2013
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,481
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

very interesting re the white cell count - are there any specifics on which types are boosted? is there a paper available somewhere

not surprising anyway, organisms evolve to make use of every part of their environment and its natural cycles.
formica is offline  
Old 01-03-14, 04:41 AM   #58
Lankyrob
Non Carborundum Illegitimi
 
Lankyrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2010
Location: Keynsham
Age: 49
Posts: 9,556
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Are these halide lamps what i woukd call a MVB ( mercury vapour bulb)
__________________
May you have more good days than bad
You never know how strong you are - until being strong is your only choice
There are no dark clouds - just well hidden silver linings!!
Lankyrob is offline  
Old 01-03-14, 04:45 AM   #59
formica
Member
 
formica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2013
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,481
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

mercury vapour lamp is a type of metal halide lamp
formica is offline  
Old 01-03-14, 05:28 AM   #60
infernalis
Moderator
 
infernalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2008
Location: Central New York State
Age: 60
Posts: 16,536
Country:
Re: The UVB Varanid debate !

Quote:
Originally Posted by formica View Post
mercury vapour lamp is a type of metal halide lamp
You have that backward, mercury vapour lamps were invented 30 years prior to metal halide lamps.

A mercury vapour lamp has no halides (metal salts) in the plasma arc tube, Metal halide lamps are mercury vapour lamps with an additional metal salt compound (halides) added to the amalgam to broaden the spectral output.

One of the factors that caused experimentation with the arc tube contents was that a raw mercury vapour lamp output very high UV that would be harmful to stare into the bulb for any length of time, The first solution was to coat the glass envelope (outer bulb) with a UV reactive phosphor, that's how modern day florescent bulbs were born... the main difference between a florescent bulb and a mercury vapour bulb is the gas pressure inside the lamp. A MV lamp has very high pressure inside the arc tube, and generates such an intense heat that the amalgam must be contained in a quartz tube as the temperatures achieved in operation will melt standard silica glass, the low pressure content of a florescent lamp generates far less heat, so standard glass works fine.

However, the phosphor coatings were inefficient compared to doping the mercury itself, this is why we almost never see a frosty white coating on a metal halide lamp, but almost always see a frosty white coating on mercury vapour lamps.

From a manufacturing standpoint it's cheaper to make the metal halide lamps, a minuscule grain of halide salt is a lot cheaper than a whole coating of phosphorescent materials, and less harmful to the environment when the lamp is no longer usable.
__________________
"Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes
of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?"

Last edited by infernalis; 01-03-14 at 05:38 AM..
infernalis is offline  
Login to remove ads
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.

right