106 Burmese pythons captured in Florida... - Page 2

Bandit · 02-29-16, 02:59 PM

Also, let's assume that the state decides they only want to try to remove the bigger, more threatening animals (burms, iguanas, tegus, etc.). I just don't see it happening. The focus should be on preventing further invasion by exotics that are not already out there.

At what point do we just say, "they're here and there's nothing we can do about it." Because as much as I want to see it happen, I just can't imagine any number of people wiping out every single python, iguana, tegu, boa, monitor, chameleon, etc.

I know that a couple people recently found a red-tailed green rat snake out there. To my knowledge they haven't really been established in Florida. Tightening up regulations and increasing sanctions may be effective in preventing people from losing/letting go new species into the environment.

**Minkness** · 02-29-16, 03:11 PM

Perhaps then it should just outlaw breeding or mass inports of those species? A few pets will die out before finding a mate, but a mass escape like during the hurricane is a serious issue.

As for dealing with the current population, I feel that if they could budget to hire more people, log more hours, and offer more incentive for citizens to hunt as well, that while not able to 'eradicate' the population, may help keep it in check. And that could go for all invasive species.

Bandit · 02-29-16, 03:55 PM

I agree Mink. But I've been skeptical of the methods used thus far. The hunt is only a month and only in certain areas of the glades. So there are still many areas that are still safe for pythons during the hunt.

Another issue I have is that if you see a python and you don't have a permit to handle them, you can't kill them, capture them, or even touch them to keep them where they are until officials arrive. You'll get fined for handling them, which I think is ridiculous. I would understand getting fined for handling native species, but it would be much more productive to allow people to capture them and bring them in, or wait until officials come to take them. Because even if you report it, there's a solid chance that the snake won't be there by the time officials arrive.

IW17 · 02-29-16, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bandit

I agree Mink. But I've been skeptical of the methods used thus far. The hunt is only a month and only in certain areas of the glades. So there are still many areas that are still safe for pythons during the hunt.

Another issue I have is that if you see a python and you don't have a permit to handle them, you can't kill them, capture them, or even touch them to keep them where they are until officials arrive. You'll get fined for handling them, which I think is ridiculous. I would understand getting fined for handling native species, but it would be much more productive to allow people to capture them and bring them in, or wait until officials come to take them. Because even if you report it, there's a solid chance that the snake won't be there by the time officials arrive.

I forgot about that. I'm going to assume they would say this is for the safety of the public, but it's really just a money grab. Why not let people hunt these animals the same way we hunt any other legal game species?

chairman · 02-29-16, 06:42 PM

I believe that they require live capture because officials are pretty sure that the hunters will be bagging significant volumes of native snakes. Many seasoned outdoor people don't take the time to learn to identify snakes.

Similarly, large portions of the glades are protected from the hunt to prevent poachers of other wildlife from masquerading as "snake hunters."

Burms have no business being wild in FL. I think that they should all be humanely put down. Hunts like this can't possibly be very effective but they do represent a somewhat reasonable compromise when you consider the need to get rid of the invasives while protecting the natural environment. The best way to kill the burms in south FL is to just patiently wait for a 2-3 day cold snap during winter.

In reality, habitat loss has to be the greatest killer of Florida's native wildlife. But blaming large snakes is waaaay sexier.

Bandit · 02-29-16, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chairman

I believe that they require live capture because officials are pretty sure that the hunters will be bagging significant volumes of native snakes. Many seasoned outdoor people don't take the time to learn to identify snakes.

Similarly, large portions of the glades are protected from the hunt to prevent poachers of other wildlife from masquerading as "snake hunters."

Burms have no business being wild in FL. I think that they should all be humanely put down. Hunts like this can't possibly be very effective but they do represent a somewhat reasonable compromise when you consider the need to get rid of the invasives while protecting the natural environment. The best way to kill the burms in south FL is to just patiently wait for a 2-3 day cold snap during winter.

In reality, habitat loss has to be the greatest killer of Florida's native wildlife. But blaming large snakes is waaaay sexier.

Very good points. I do like that they require live catches. You're right, people would be killing all sorts of snakes and then bringing them to the headquarters only to be told they killed the wrong snake. However, I do feel like people outside of the hunt should be legally allowed to capture burms, at the very least to hold them until officials arrive.

Unfortunately you're right about the cold snap. That will be the only truly effective way to kill them off. But I guess that lies in the hands of mother nature.

IW17 · 03-01-16, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chairman

I believe that they require live capture because officials are pretty sure that the hunters will be bagging significant volumes of native snakes. Many seasoned outdoor people don't take the time to learn to identify snakes.

Similarly, large portions of the glades are protected from the hunt to prevent poachers of other wildlife from masquerading as "snake hunters."

Burms have no business being wild in FL. I think that they should all be humanely put down. Hunts like this can't possibly be very effective but they do represent a somewhat reasonable compromise when you consider the need to get rid of the invasives while protecting the natural environment. The best way to kill the burms in south FL is to just patiently wait for a 2-3 day cold snap during winter.

In reality, habitat loss has to be the greatest killer of Florida's native wildlife. But blaming large snakes is waaaay sexier.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Humble308

Interesting info, although I've got to think it's a bit out of context. How many people own dogs compared to giant pythons, naturally the number will be higher. I posed this subject as less of concern for humans as for the environment. I reckon more people are scared of their pets getting snatched up than getting hurt themselves.

One of the issues in my opinion is besides larger reptiles, the giant snakes don't have natural predators as adults. While some non-native species have had little impact on the ecosystem, others (the European Starling being a prime example) have devastated the local populations. When you've got snakes that can bring down small deer then we've got issues.

I'd have to go along with IW17 and say allow open game seasons on the snakes. As a hunter myself I've seen that populations can be managed through selective culling and monitoring. Problem is you get all these cooters shooting anything that slithers. While we all love animals and would prefer them to be rehomed, it's just not realistic. We have enough trouble at our shelter adopting out corns or RTB's, what're they supposed to with 100+ Burms!

I don't think licensing will solve too many problems but it's sure a step in the right direction. I find it curious that in my county you've got to have a dog license to adopt a dog from a shelter and go through the whole shabang with all the paperwork and a borderline background check...but you can go down to the local reptile expo and buy a retic and no one would be the wiser. It's kinda crappy to impose rules on folks who want to own them, but with such a large animal I think it's an increased amount of responsibility. I think here in Ohio you have to have a large constrictor permit, but I could be wrong on this. How bout yall, any local legislation regarding the larger snakes?

Stopping people from killing any snake they see, is an easy fix. Make it illegal. Just like a deer hunter is responsible to know the difference between a whitetail deer and a keys deer. Once the heavy fines start rolling in on illegally killing protected species, the cowboys would dwindle away, and the responsible people looking to make a difference would be able to do so.

Tiny Boidae · 02-29-16, 07:22 PM

Decided to look into the real "threat" of these bloodthirsty monsters....
In the US, dogs attacked 47 people in the year of 2014, and killed 27. Between 1978-2009, burmese pythons killed 16 people in the US, and most of these were in the captive care of irresponsible owners. I think the problem is definitely over-sensationalized, and doing a quick google search of what the media said a few years back, the titles usually ran along the lines of "Massive Burmese Pythons Invading the Florida Everglades- Squeezing the life out of the ecosystem". Definitely not beneficial, but no one seems to be in a hurry to make a sport out of killing Cuban Tree Frogs, or the nutria, or the scarlet macaw. I think more focus needs to be put in PREVENTING new species from becoming established, instead of trying to eradicate a species that we probably won't be able to dent. Hence why I think that any non-native species needs to be placed under a strict licensing law to prevent this problem from becoming worse.

(Interesting site if anyone wants to see all of what Florida is hosting right now: Nonnative Species )

AwesomeGuy376 · 02-29-16, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiny Boidae

Decided to look into the real "threat" of these bloodthirsty monsters....
In the US, dogs attacked 47 people in the year of 2014, and killed 27. Between 1978-2009, burmese pythons killed 16 people in the US, and most of these were in the captive care of irresponsible owners. I think the problem is definitely over-sensationalized, and doing a quick google search of what the media said a few years back, the titles usually ran along the lines of "Massive Burmese Pythons Invading the Florida Everglades- Squeezing the life out of the ecosystem". Definitely not beneficial, but no one seems to be in a hurry to make a sport out of killing Cuban Tree Frogs, or the nutria, or the scarlet macaw. I think more focus needs to be put in PREVENTING new species from becoming established, instead of trying to eradicate a species that we probably won't be able to dent. Hence why I think that any non-native species needs to be placed under a strict licensing law to prevent this problem from becoming worse.

(Interesting site if anyone wants to see all of what Florida is hosting right now: Nonnative Species )

I hate how so many people are deathly afraid of snakes.. Its annoying when people automatically think a snake wants to kill them, then they shoot or harm it.. Especially when people think snakes like pythons are venomous.. One time we went herping and brought my friend along, we found a colubrid and she nearly tried to kill it out of fear (We were holding it so she couldnt touch it).. but yea

Humble308 · 02-29-16, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiny Boidae

Decided to look into the real "threat" of these bloodthirsty monsters....
In the US, dogs attacked 47 people in the year of 2014, and killed 27. Between 1978-2009, burmese pythons killed 16 people in the US, and most of these were in the captive care of irresponsible owners. I think the problem is definitely over-sensationalized, and doing a quick google search of what the media said a few years back, the titles usually ran along the lines of "Massive Burmese Pythons Invading the Florida Everglades- Squeezing the life out of the ecosystem". Definitely not beneficial, but no one seems to be in a hurry to make a sport out of killing Cuban Tree Frogs, or the nutria, or the scarlet macaw. I think more focus needs to be put in PREVENTING new species from becoming established, instead of trying to eradicate a species that we probably won't be able to dent. Hence why I think that any non-native species needs to be placed under a strict licensing law to prevent this problem from becoming worse.

(Interesting site if anyone wants to see all of what Florida is hosting right now: Nonnative Species )

Interesting info, although I've got to think it's a bit out of context. How many people own dogs compared to giant pythons, naturally the number will be higher. I posed this subject as less of concern for humans as for the environment. I reckon more people are scared of their pets getting snatched up than getting hurt themselves.

One of the issues in my opinion is besides larger reptiles, the giant snakes don't have natural predators as adults. While some non-native species have had little impact on the ecosystem, others (the European Starling being a prime example) have devastated the local populations. When you've got snakes that can bring down small deer then we've got issues.

I'd have to go along with IW17 and say allow open game seasons on the snakes. As a hunter myself I've seen that populations can be managed through selective culling and monitoring. Problem is you get all these cooters shooting anything that slithers. While we all love animals and would prefer them to be rehomed, it's just not realistic. We have enough trouble at our shelter adopting out corns or RTB's, what're they supposed to with 100+ Burms!

I don't think licensing will solve too many problems but it's sure a step in the right direction. I find it curious that in my county you've got to have a dog license to adopt a dog from a shelter and go through the whole shabang with all the paperwork and a borderline background check...but you can go down to the local reptile expo and buy a retic and no one would be the wiser. It's kinda crappy to impose rules on folks who want to own them, but with such a large animal I think it's an increased amount of responsibility. I think here in Ohio you have to have a large constrictor permit, but I could be wrong on this. How bout yall, any local legislation regarding the larger snakes?

**Minkness** · 02-29-16, 07:24 PM

A cold snap would need to be for a looooong time because if they burrow, the heat is held deep in the ground for a loooong time. It will almost never get cold enougj long enough to kill them off. And, if it did, it would kill off all the other wildlife that we want to protect.

Bandit · 02-29-16, 08:12 PM

It's just shy of a dream to actually rid South Florida of the species that are already established there. So again, I think the focus should be on preventing the introduction of more species.

On a side note, when I visit South Florida (which will hopefully be within the next couple of years) I wouldn't mind taking home one of those wild veiled chameleons and one of those boas from Deering Estate. I have no idea what the regulations are about that outside of the Everglades, but I'm sure I wouldn't be the only one willing to do that lol.

RAD House · 03-02-16, 11:08 AM

Hunting has been proven to be a very effective population control in the United states. In some cases it shown to be so overly effective that in resulted in the elimination of keystone species. In less than a hundred years the population of American bison was reduced from 60,000,000 to 300 entirely due to hunting. Both the wolf and brown bear went extinct in the wild in the continental United states due to hunting. To say that this is not a curable problem is just not accurate, but the problem is if there is enough money to keep the hunters hungry. I agree IW17 about fines, just the threat of fines will make most people learn fairly quickly the difference between a python and a rat snake. I mean I have duck hunted for years and you must be able to tell the difference between species with in seconds from 100 feet away.

Bandit · 03-02-16, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MesoCorney

Hunting has been proven to be a very effective population control in the United states. In some cases it shown to be so overly effective that in resulted in the elimination of keystone species. In less than a hundred years the population of American bison was reduced from 60,000,000 to 300 entirely due to hunting. Both the wolf and brown bear went extinct in the wild in the continental United states due to hunting. To say that this is not a curable problem is just not accurate, but the problem is if there is enough money to keep the hunters hungry. I agree IW17 about fines, just the threat of fines will make most people learn fairly quickly the difference between a python and a rat snake. I mean I have duck hunted for years and you must be able to tell the difference between species with in seconds from 100 feet away.

I wasn't saying hunting couldn't be effective, but "the hunt" is not an effective way to get rid of them. It's too many inexperienced people hunting them in a very limited amount of time in very limited areas of South Florida.

Call me pessimistic, but I just don't see a man-made way to stop this with the way things are going. And I guess that's more of what I'm getting at - there may be ways to stop it, but at this point the means being used are not effective enough.

Bandit · 03-02-16, 11:10 AM

On a side note, here in southern Louisiana we had a very mild winter. This was the warmest winter I've seen in a while. I know two exotics in my immediate have already been found (ball python in January and red tail boa in February). It will be interesting to see if more exotics are seen here this year since they could have easily survived the winter.