border
sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum
 

Go Back   sSNAKESs : Reptile Forum > Python Forums > Giant Python Discussion

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-14, 12:41 PM   #16
Tsubaki
Forum Moderator
 
Tsubaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan-2014
Posts: 4,329
Country:
Re: retic genes=size?

Very nice!! and a excellent choice
__________________
Aho ni toriau baka!- Baka wa shinanakya naoranai...
Tsubaki is offline  
Old 02-03-14, 02:28 PM   #17
lemon
Member
 
lemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug-2012
Posts: 102
Country:
Re: retic genes=size?

Only the original Tigers are giants.

Most of the tigers you see these days are quite small.

The closer a morph is to a mainland or wc animal the larger it should be.

In the wild as you know only the strongest survive. In the python world this is very much associated with the biggest. Hence big males breed big female and produce big offspring. Even then only the strongest out of a very strong clutch survive to breeding size.

Also when a morph comes out it derives from fewer sources, for example the majority of the original tigers could come from bob and Fluffy so carry her genes. whereas now every man and his dog has bred tigers and cross bred etc etc and they no longer gain the sizes they originally did.
lemon is offline  
Old 02-03-14, 03:51 PM   #18
venom_king
Member
 
Join Date: Apr-2013
Posts: 92
Country:
Re: retic genes=size?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemon View Post
Only the original Tigers are giants.

Most of the tigers you see these days are quite small.

The closer a morph is to a mainland or wc animal the larger it should be.

In the wild as you know only the strongest survive. In the python world this is very much associated with the biggest. Hence big males breed big female and produce big offspring. Even then only the strongest out of a very strong clutch survive to breeding size.

Also when a morph comes out it derives from fewer sources, for example the majority of the original tigers could come from bob and Fluffy so carry her genes. whereas now every man and his dog has bred tigers and cross bred etc etc and they no longer gain the sizes they originally did.
So the same with saltys then big parents=big babies! The fluffy you mentioned is that the same 20 odd ft fluffy?
venom_king is offline  
Old 02-04-14, 03:11 AM   #19
millertime89
Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep-2011
Location: Overhill and underhill.
Posts: 7,365
Country:
Re: retic genes=size?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsubaki View Post
I have not heard of those yet! None known in Europe, i would LOVE to see pictures if you happen to know where to find any? And i agree, some Kayuadi do not like to stay dwarfish sizes either
I can't even get pictures. Rodney Boalich has them and we're not exactly on speeking terms due to his anti-USARK stance.
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/KyleMillerPhotography1 & https://www.facebook.com/KylesQualityConstrictors
"We all have a common enemy and I can assure you it's nobody in this hobby." - Brian Barczyk
millertime89 is offline  
Old 02-04-14, 05:28 AM   #20
Tsubaki
Forum Moderator
 
Tsubaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan-2014
Posts: 4,329
Country:
Re: retic genes=size?

That's a shame, maybe i will get to see some eventually.. I can be patient. (At least i try to keep telling myself that i can )
__________________
Aho ni toriau baka!- Baka wa shinanakya naoranai...
Tsubaki is offline  
Login to remove ads
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.

right