Quote:
Originally Posted by EmbraceCalamity
Oh looky.  There was no point in commenting that the device itself was the same as I wasn't commenting on the device itself at all. I was commenting on the use of the device. Can you follow that?
~Maggot |
Ahh that rebelious argue with everything teenager phase. I remember my first beer. You see the issue is I said the device is the same, then you claim I was saying the use is the same, when never did I say that. You can comment all you want that they would use a different technique, but that's clearly not what you were doing.Can you follow that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmbraceCalamity
They wouldn't pick it up by its throat and take a picture. So no, it would not have been the same thing.
~Maggot
|
You see, regardless of how they used it, it would still be the same device, which is what I said. If you wanted to suggest the technique would have been different, you could have done that, not reply to what I said saying the "same" thing. Your comment does not fit without going off mine. Hard to follow I know, it's complex stuff.
Threaded Mode