Quote:
|
This is a funny debate! anyways you blood doesn't crystalize before you die! so bite me! and if you have alot you are going to end up freezing them anyways no matter what you are killing them they dies there life is over !! and if you freeze them you dont half to deal with wacking the animal till it dies doesn't semm so awful in comparrison
|
my my, that was coherent. And the "bite me" remark certainly won you lots of respect! I'm impressed.
But seriously, I don't think you're aware of the fact that freezing a body causes massive damage to cells and blood vessels. Why do you think they can't revive frozen bodies, even though they can revive drown victimes or suffocation victimes (even though the outcome may be a diminished mental capacity). As a matter of fact, according to Professor David Pegg of York University, "The problem cryonics has is that they're taking someone who is dead and freezing them which destroys the body's cells. In mammalian tissue, ice forms at quite a 'high' [relatively high] temperature, causing massive damage to the complicated cell structures which make up the internal organs."
Moreover, I think you are missing the point of the argument. YES the pinkies are going to die and YES they are going to be frozen, but that's beyond the point (not to mention, blindingly obvious). The matter at hand is HOW the killing can be done, as humanely as possible. Freezing is NOT humane. I don't know if you've ever been locked out of the house in 30-below weather, but I assure you it isn't pleasant and yes, your cells and veins are ruptured (again, unpleasant) because when water crystalizes (let's not forget, seann, how much of our bodies are made up of water) it increases in volume (you can see that when you freeze water in an ice cube tray).
Zoe
Threaded Mode