Great, now we have to fight OTHER animal lovers - Page 2

bigsnakegirl785 · 10-30-11, 02:21 PM

I think our government is getting a little more confused by the day. I agree Snakefood, the Ohio incident had absolutely nothing to do with ownership of snakes. Not one of those animals was a reptile of any form. Not only that, but they killed every single one of the animals when all they would have had to do is relocate them to another zoo (I realize a zoo would be the last option due to most having as many as they can carry) or a reserve and work to get them ready to release into the wild. That whole incident was, in my opinion, a complete waste of time and lives.

**millertime89** · 10-30-11, 02:27 PM

wow... when will legislators realize that poorly written laws, even if they manage to pass, will be thrown out once challenged in the supreme court? Laws written and passed in reaction to fear are generally the worst laws on the books.

bigsnakegirl785 · 10-30-11, 02:32 PM

When it comes to banning animals, I think only the ones that cannot be bred in captivity should be banned. If you can't breed them, you'll take them out of their natural habitat and they will go extinct. If an animal is endangered or even critically endangered if they can be bred in captivity, they should be regulated not banned.