| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02bfd/02bfd12c763217fade398a9964fce3ba2390e0cc" alt="border" |
Notices |
Welcome to the sSnakeSs community. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
04-21-03, 05:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Posts: 1,470
|
DEBATE: Housing of Ball Pythons
Well there have been many informative debates going on lately with people contributing very valid points. I therefore have a battle to start here, something that has been bothering me since i started herping.
Please note I am using ball pythons as a specific as it is most said with them. Why is it said that a ball python should have a really small enclosure when they are small? What proof is there of this? What justification is there? What is the reasoning behind this statement? I really do not understand it, I mean over in Africa I am quite sure that they do not live in little tuppawares, nor any specifc area of a similar size. Im hoping someone will clear this up for me, as from my perspective it is an excuse to house them in cheap enclosures.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 06:16 PM
|
#2
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec-2002
Location: London
Posts: 3,332
Country:
|
They live in large grasslands with tall grass, therefore at their viewpoint it is not a large open area. They also usually crawl into rodent burrows, clear them, and wait until they are finished digesting before leaving the burrow, therefore feeding in a small dark area.
The reasons people say that smaller is better is because of those reasons, yes it is money saving, but contrary to your belief, the places they usually are found in the wild are small tight places. I house my baby in a 20 gallon and I feel if there is enough things in the cage it will not freak out, and since mine has eaten in it's tank, my theory in this case is correct.
I love debates like these.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 06:36 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Posts: 1,470
|
Alright I forgot to put that in sorry. I meant to say if I were to give a ball a 130 gallon with plenty hides, there is no reason why I couldnt right? It would be the same as the wild where they have a large area with a choice where to live.
At the same time, I have another question to add, similar to this. What are signs of stress, and how can you tell if your snake is stressed.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 07:23 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Join Date: Apr-2002
Posts: 412
|
I think the most obvious sign of stress would be to have the snake go off its food, or regurgitate its food...(these would only be valid signs of stress if the temps and other environmental factors were correct, though...and you'd also have to rule out reproductive reasons for going off feed)
|
|
|
04-21-03, 07:26 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Join Date: Apr-2003
Posts: 32
|
I suppose a large cage with plenty of hides would work....if you have LOTS of spare time and energy. Why? Because a larger cage requires more maintenance and they are harder to regulate proper temps and humidity, and to monitor the animals health closely. Ball pythons are a naturally shy, reclusive snake and too much space or open areas can stress them out which will lead to many possible problems. I house my sub-adult in a 38 quart rubbermaid and I reguarly get him out to exercise. He very rarely comes out of his hide unless he is hungry or very late at night. Large cages are for the most part impractical for ball pythons as they are not very active snakes nor are they display animals.
__________________
Facts:
_
1.___ Ninjas are mammals.
2.___ Ninjas fight ALL the time.
3.___ The purpose of the ninja is to flip out and kill people.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 07:41 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: BC
Posts: 9,740
|
Easy....
Quote:
Why is it said that a ball python should have a really small enclosure when they are small?
|
No one said that you CAN'T keep a Ball in a large cage. I did it for 10 years and bred them. So why do most people give that advice? Well, how well-versed do you think a newcomer is to snake microhabitats? Probably not very well. So do you think they will have the knowledge and wherewithall to create a suitable habitat for a very shy and withdrawn snake that eats sporadically? No, they won't. Couple that with the fact that they usually buy a garbage WC that even the most experienced keeper would pull his/her hair out trying to feed.
Smaller cage means less mistakes. Temps are easier. Humidity is easier. The whole cage is the hidebox so the snake doesn't have to search for a hide.
Plus its tried and true. If it isn't broke, then why strive for reasons to fix it?
|
|
|
04-21-03, 07:51 PM
|
#7
|
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec-2002
Location: London
Posts: 3,332
Country:
|
Why a 130 instead of a 20?? That makes no sense to me! Firstly, it would be heavy as hell if you needed to move it and secondly it would be really expensive to keep heated properly! Why not save the pain?
|
|
|
04-21-03, 07:53 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Posts: 1,470
|
Yes but do we always have to do things easier for us, without knowing for sure how it affects the snake? I mean if a ball python will do better in a large cage with lots of hides, is it the well being of the snake we should be worried about or the ease on us? Maybe it will take a while to sink in but I cannot establish, morally or intellectually, how a smaller enclosure is better for the snake. I guess im not really arguing just searching for answers and reasoning. So far everyone has said how its easier on us, but not why it is better for the snake. If multiple hides are provided in a larger aquarium, is that better then a small enclosure with one hide? What proof is there of this. Me, I am trying to take it through natures prospective. They are not limited to a small space, rather they have a very large space with many hides provided. Do we always have to provide the minumums?
Last edited by tHeGiNo; 04-21-03 at 07:55 PM..
|
|
|
04-21-03, 08:09 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: BC
Posts: 9,740
|
.....
If you're going with what they have in nature, why limit yourself to spatial measures? Why not give them mites and ticks? Why not give them unusable temperatures 70% of their lives? Introduce a couple predators and disease and you've got the perfect wild Ball Python.
Now back to captives.....
For a small reclusive, somewhat fossorial snake, smaller cages work. They have proven to work better over the DECADES. Why? Does it matter? Maybe. I think there are numerous reasons; some we know, some we think we know, and some we haven't though of yet.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 08:21 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Posts: 1,470
|
Don't get me wrong, I am throwing these statements out for no reason. First of all, no need to be a smart *** ahaha. I could flip that around and say why not give them a fridge and stove to cook their food on because we are taking care of them, couldn't I? Or thats like saying lets throw in sars in your house, along with a tiger. Because there is a possibility of having a predator and disease doesn't mean it is there right? Anyhow, I just said that in a relative figure. Back to what your saying, your not answering my question and I dont blame you, because I was trying to figure this out myself. You said it has been proved it is better that way, but don't know how. Basically, it is possibly some Joe Blow decided to say it is better for them, with no proof? And why you ask? Does it matter? Yes actually. I mean if I told you you shouldn't eat porkchops, your going to want to know why aren't you?
Quote:
They have proven to work better over the DECADES. Why? Does it matter? Maybe. I think there are numerous reasons; some we know, some we think we know, and some we haven't though of yet.
|
In no way should you think I am trying to be offensive or be a prick or anything, I'm just trying to find some answers. This is just the same as I dont take what you say offensively. Basically you are contradicting yourself. You said in a previous debate that we cannot tell if your animal is stressed, saying such this as "what did your snake tell you....". That is exactly what I am saying here. The only reason anyone says behind using smaller enclosures is stress wise, yet how can we tell? Also you said in the above quote that there are some we know, what are those?
|
|
|
04-21-03, 09:12 PM
|
#11
|
Super Genius
Join Date: Nov-2002
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Age: 49
Posts: 6,292
|
I would have to agree with Jeff, I had my bp's in a 'natural' environment and months ago, changed them all to 14 qt. rubbermaids, and my personal experiences have shown that they eat, poop, and generally APPEAR much more acclimated in a smaller, "man-made" environment. Also makes EVERYTHING easier from my standpoint.
|
|
|
04-21-03, 09:32 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Join Date: Jan-2003
Posts: 1,470
|
By natural environment, what do you mean by that?
|
|
|
04-21-03, 09:36 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: BC
Posts: 9,740
|
Nope...
Quote:
First of all, no need to be a smart *** ahaha. I could flip that around and say why not give them a fridge and stove to cook their food on because we are taking care of them, couldn't I?
|
Not being a smart *** at all. There are a ton of things in a Ball Python’s environment that are useless to them. For some strange reason, people always use the argument that because the spatial scale of the world is large, captive snakes should be kept in large cages. That couldn’t be further from the truth. Snakes should be kept in large cages if they use the space. Some snakes do. A lot don’t. Ball Pythons don’t. So when I said that you should include mites, ticks, predators etc etc I was making the point that there usable things in a BP’s environment, and there are non-usable things. Our job is to eliminate the non-usable things and find the usable things. If they used a fridge or stove, then I would give them to my Ball Pythons. But fortunately they don’t.
Quote:
You said it has been proved it is better that way, but don't know how. Basically, it is possibly some Joe Blow decided to say it is better for them, with no proof? And why you ask? Does it matter? Yes actually. I mean if I told you you shouldn't eat porkchops, your going to want to know why aren't you?
|
It is certainly possible that some shmo could have made this stuff up, but that wouldn’t explain why all the top breeders use small cages and why its worked for the last 20 years. I mean, there is millions of dollars involved in BP breeding, do you think these guys would use unproven methods? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d01/98d01386c29aba45b09c9d9f81631ed8057c7636" alt="Big Grin" When I say that I don’t know how it works better, I mean that the mechanisms aren’t fully understood. If that’s your goal, well then by all means set up experiments, do field work, and find the answers. But the goal of most is to find what works to breed these animals and keep them healthy. Once that is found, then methods are constantly refined for economic and efficiency reasons.
Quote:
You said in a previous debate that we cannot tell if your animal is stressed
|
Holy moly, I would never say that. Reading snakes is he most fundamental part of Advanced Husbandry 101. I can tell if an animal is stressed. Piece of cake. Its trying to figure out if they are not stressed that’s the tough part. And when you think about it, are snakes EVER not stressed? I mean, everything’s an enemy that can cause damage, even food items for crying out loud! Its reducing the stress that is the key. And basic snake knowledge makes that possible.
Quote:
The only reason anyone says behind using smaller enclosures is stress wise, yet how can we tell?
|
Not sure who would say that. There’s a TON of reasons to use smaller cages with stress being one small factor.
Thoughts?
Last edited by Jeff_Favelle; 04-21-03 at 09:40 PM..
|
|
|
04-21-03, 09:38 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Join Date: Mar-2002
Location: BC
Posts: 9,740
|
....
Quote:
By natural environment, what do you mean by that?
|
He means naturalistic setup which is a common term in the industry for setups that have more than the basics for the animal. In other words, tons of non-usable things (not always) for the animal purely for our enjoyment. Not a bad thing, but not really a good thing (for the animal). Kinda neutral.
|
|
|
04-22-03, 05:33 AM
|
#15
|
Member
Join Date: Apr-2003
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 558
Country:
|
When i got my Bp the sales person told me to keep him in the tiny plastic cage i was given to keep him in because he is 'shy'. But me being me thought he needed more room so i moved him up into a 40 cm long bigger plastic viv. Now he comes out of his hide at night and seems less stressed and much more friendly but i still havn't told the person who sold him to me that i moved him and went against his advice cos i'm pretty sure he would KILL me! So i think given the chance Bp's like more space.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/831de/831de6dae2ee3d9d897dff41e17d76f5815c150b" alt=""
Copyright © 2002-2023, Hobby Solutions.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a530a/a530a0c66eddc392b1e77c20e6e49010eb44363a" alt="right" |