I don't know your thoughts on this matter, but i don't really know what to think. When an animal attacks a human being, usually gets killed. And i mean AFTER the incident, when nothing can be done to change the event. I would even like to post a link to be of example:
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news...09/detail.html
Follow my thoughts: If we are killing an animal AFTER the incident, we are not avoiding anything because the attack already took place, so looks like it's about revenge or something, wich is stupid because animals aren't responsable for their actions, they only follow instincts. Well, then that's something that people should think ahead, now ins't it? like...i don't know, maybe... WHEN THEY DECIDE TO KEEP THEM!!???
The botton line is, no animal is 100% trustworthy (hell, not even people are), but we know that when we take them inside our homes. So right there we are kind of signing our responsability form. That given animal could attack in a month, a year, 10 years, someday... but the potencial was always there, every minute of it's life in captivity. Just like that same potencial to attack is inside that other cute pet next door that has done nothing wrong SO FAR. But could one day...
What are we gonna do? kill them all? Then preferably BEFORE they go mad, not after. And when is that?...Doesn't make much sense to me.
Threaded Mode