wyz
03-26-04, 02:01 PM
Ok... I think I know that one, but I wanna double check..
So please answer if you know the answer, not if you think you know it :)
If I breed an anery with an amelansic
I get babies that are het for snow. Wich mean they are double HET anery/amel. This part is clear..
So if I take these babies and breed them together, I expect to get 6.25% (1 on 16 chances) of getting a snow offspring.
That assuming that I'm considering them double hets..
If I use the term het for snow instead of double het for anery and amel.
One could assume that breeding a male het for snow to a female het for snow would result in
25% snow
25% regular
50% het for snow.
So wich one is correct ?
I think it's 1 in 16, Am i Right ?
Thanks.
WYZ
http://www.wyzza.ca/album/cornsnake/copulation_amel_anery_260304_1.JPG
So please answer if you know the answer, not if you think you know it :)
If I breed an anery with an amelansic
I get babies that are het for snow. Wich mean they are double HET anery/amel. This part is clear..
So if I take these babies and breed them together, I expect to get 6.25% (1 on 16 chances) of getting a snow offspring.
That assuming that I'm considering them double hets..
If I use the term het for snow instead of double het for anery and amel.
One could assume that breeding a male het for snow to a female het for snow would result in
25% snow
25% regular
50% het for snow.
So wich one is correct ?
I think it's 1 in 16, Am i Right ?
Thanks.
WYZ
http://www.wyzza.ca/album/cornsnake/copulation_amel_anery_260304_1.JPG