War...touchy subject, please act civil

[tHeGiNo]

As the title implies, this may be a touchy subject, so if you know your one of those people who like to start fights and like to argue without any hostility or civilty, please to not read on.

The war on Iraq. Chances are probably around 80% that we are going to war, and I would say that is minimum. If Iraq does not comply with the wishes of the UN, to his weapons by March 28th, then we let the wars begin. I honestly have a bad feeling this is going to be a messy war, it is really not looking good. The thing which irritates me is when they hear about the war on Iraq the first thing that comes to mind is oil and the "stupid" president of the United States. One thing you HAVE to realize is Iraq DOES indeed have these weapons, the whole UN agrees with this. If we do not put a stop to this freak now, who knows what the outcome will be. What you have to realize is the stupidity of these moron americans from the weapon inspectors. They inform Iraq when and where they will be checking next, which gives Iraq time to hide the weapons, move it to another spot. If they cannot realize this I do not know what is wrong with them; it is a bigger scale of the game cat and mouse. Don't get me wrong, in no way what so-ever to I support war, but the UN has tried compromise and now war is the only other means of showing this freak we mean business. Canada, **** I am really suprised. There is no doubt Jean Cretien had nothing to do with coming up with this decision. We, if I am not mistaken, made the agreement in which Iraq has until the 28th to comply with the wishes of the UN. IF we do go to war, we will not DIRECTLY be fighting in the war, rather we will provide assistance from fleeing on the waters, using what submarines and navy we have. Bravo, very smart decision. What we all HAVE to realize is this isn't only about oil, it just isn't. We have to recognize that we do not know everything, the government hides a lot, as I have said before on this forum, if Iraq was really planning a nuclear attack do you think they would tell us? If they did just imagine the chaos it would cause. Well anyone, to temporarily end my essay here, I will see what you guys all think of this war. Please lets act mature, I am stating my opinion, now you state yours.

[tHeGiNo]

Also, what we have to notice is that this is not a new war, they are finishing what they had not sucessfully completed in the last war with Iraq. Saddam is a damn phsyco, did you know that around the borders he places innocent families so that we will feel bad about trying to get through, having to kill the innocent. Are you aware he pays people's families THOUSANDS of dollars to commit suicide bombings, THOUSANDS. This is not even half of the craze this moron possesses, we really have to understand his mentality to know why US is so serious about this.

[tHeGiNo]

**Please Note I will Edit This When I Remember What I Have Forgot**

Again I really have to stress I DO NOT SUPPORT WAR, I just do not see another means of compromise.

For another few facts, Saddam proposed to have a one on one interview with US. A whole bunch of crap, and stalling is all I see it. During an interview, Saddam stated:

"Iraq is allowed to prepare proper missiles and we are committed to that."

Keep that in mind. They then asked whether the Al-Samoud 2 missiles are "proper," Saddam was quoted as saying: "We do not have missiles that go beyond the prescribed range."

The order was issued after international experts determined the missile flew farther than the 150-km limit set by the UN in 1991. Iraq maintains some of the missiles overshot the limit because they were tested without warheads and guidance systems.

As you may or may not know, Iraq has until the end of the week to begin destroying the missiles. If it fails to do so, that could give impetus to a draft UN resolution submitted by the U.S., Britain and Spain. This would pave the way for war.

Also. Iraq had suggested it was trying to persuade the UN to allow it to keep the missiles after technical modifications worked out in talks with UN experts. A member of the UN, Fleischer, had made a VERY strong point: "If Saddam Hussein destroys the missiles that he said he never had ... you've got to wonder what other weapons does he have?"

[sSNAKESs.com]

ok this thread already has means for a argument.. "I would also like to add that the French, France, are morons, stubborn and spoiled" this subject is WAY off topic and not suitable.

[tHeGiNo]

Alright alright I took that out, but common. Understand what they are saying here. "Iraq must disarm, must destroy its weapons of mass destruction. This goal can be achieved peacefully, through inspections." This is what the prime minister of France, Chirac, had said. Give me a break...with this freak there is no peace. And what I meant to say was: "The representatives of France...", not them all in particular

[sSNAKESs.com]

Ok war topics can be discussed privatly in pms or emails, this is a very opinionated subject and it really touchy and it will get out of hand. Sorry Gino but im closing it... If someone wants to further this conversation, do so in PMs or email :) Thanks guys.